A+ CATEGORY SCIENTIFIC UNIT

Bounds on mean variance hedging in jump diffusion

Volume 50 / 2023

A. Deshpande Applicationes Mathematicae 50 (2023), 1-14 MSC: Primary 93E20. DOI: 10.4064/am2462-6-2023 Published online: 19 October 2023

Abstract

We compare the maximum principle and the linear quadratic regulator approach (LQR)/well-posedness criterion to mean variance hedging (MVH) when the wealth process follows a jump diffusion. The comparison is made possible via a measurability assumption on the coefficients of the process. Its application to determine an interval range for the MVH is explained. More precisely, in the MVH setup we show that $$0 \leq \inf _{u \in U}\tfrac{1}{2} E\Big[\int_{0}^T{y’_sy_s}\,ds+y’_Ty_T\Big] = \tfrac{1}{2}y’P^0_0y+f(P^0_0) \leq \tfrac{1}{2}y’P_0y+f(P_0),$$ where $P^0$ and $P$ satisfy a backward stochastic differential equation (BSDE) and $f$ is a measurable function affine in its only argument. The upper bound holds under the measurability assumption that all coefficients including the intensity of the jumps that drive $P$ are in fact predictable with respect to the filtration generated only by the Brownian motion. The lower bound is achieved expectedly under perfect hedging when the Föllmer–Schweizer minimal martingale probability measure is equivalent to the physical measure.

Authors

  • A. DeshpandeLondon Metropolitan University
    London, UK
    e-mail

Search for IMPAN publications

Query phrase too short. Type at least 4 characters.

Rewrite code from the image

Reload image

Reload image